No two divorces are the same and as individuals our emotions, lifestyles, and relationships are all unique. At Gislason & Hunter, we specialize in building individualized strategies and approaches to legally protect what matters the most to you is what we do best. We strive to bring clarity to your circumstances and help you prioritize your goals and efficiently achieve a favorable outcome so you can move forward.

Spousal Maintenance (Alimony)

Gislason & Hunter’s attorneys are well-versed in the law and the facts necessary to prove or defend a case to seek modification of a previously entered spousal maintenance order, or to enforce a spousal maintenance order.

What is spousal maintenance?

Spousal maintenance is a monetary award made in a dissolution or legal separation order. Basically, the spouse entitled to support under the order receives payments from the other spouse’s income or earnings. There are several factors a court will look at to determine whether or not spousal maintenance is appropriate, including the receiving spouse’s ability to provide for his or her own reasonable needs, and the ability of the payer spouse to pay maintenance.In Minnesota, spousal maintenance may be: (1) reserved by the court; (2) awarded to a spouse; (3) waived by a spouse or (4) denied by the court.

Is a spousal maintenance award permanent?

Not necessarily. Spousal maintenance can be either temporary or permanent. A temporary maintenance award is awarded for a finite period of time, for the purpose of assisting the spouse to either re-enter the job market or upgrade that spouse’s education and skills necessary to improve employment opportunities. Permanent spousal maintenance is awarded until the spouse receiving spousal maintenance remarries or until the death of either party.

Can a spousal maintenance award be changed later?

Yes. Spousal maintenance awarded on a permanent basis can be modified unless the parties specifically contract away their rights of modification.

Retirement Assets

In many divorce cases, the most valuable assets of the “marital estate” are the parties’ retirement assets. These can account for tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars in value. This article is a primer on this subject matter, summarizing (1) what forms these retirement assets commonly take, and (2) how spouses can approach a division and distribution of their retirement assets in divorce. The two main categories of retirement assets are “defined contribution” and “defined benefit” plans.

Defined contribution plans are employer-sponsored account-based plans, consisting of an employee’s own contributions to his or her retirement account over time, and perhaps the employer’s contributions like profit-sharing contributions or “matching.” These accounts are then invested, and market gains and losses are reflected in the employee’s account balance. Contributions are limited in amount per year and are generally pretax earnings, although post-tax earnings may be permitted as well (“Roth” plans). The money must remain in the defined contribution account until the employee reaches certain retirement or near-retirement ages, or for other circumstances like hardship; early withdrawals, as discussed more below, are immediately taxed as income and additionally penalized. By far the most common defined contribution plan in use today is the 401(k) plan, but there are many other defined contribution varieties.

Defined benefit plans, also called pensions, are large trust funds maintained by an employer, into which employer and/or employee contributions are made, and out of which are paid defined benefits to employees based on length of service with the employer, the employee’s averaged highest earnings, and other factors such as type of position within the employer and/or union affiliation. Pensions, unlike defined contribution plans, typically distribute benefits in annuity form measured by the life of the employee, and the employee has no individual “account.” It is important to note that the majority of both defined benefit and defined contribution plans maintained by private employers are governed by the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) and the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”). The IRC provides employers and employees with various tax breaks if the plans are “qualified.” ERISA describes what is required for plans to be “qualified,” including minimum participation and vesting standards and, as discussed below, protection for spouses and former spouses. Parties to a divorce proceeding should devote special attention to any retirement plans not covered by ERISA and the IRC because such default rules and protections would not apply to them.

Public plans are one example of non-ERISA plans. Public plans are maintained by federal, state, and local governments to benefit public employees such as public school teachers, public utility workers, police officers and firefighters, and persons in the military. These types of public plans are common in the divorce context and as a result, they generally have literature and sample judgment and decree language readily available to use.

Individual retirement accounts (“IRAs”) are not maintained by employers and are not governed by ERISA, but are maintained by the “individual” account holder. IRAs are governed by the IRC, and as a result, generally operate the same as 401(k) plans. Either pretax (“traditional”) or post-tax (“Roth”) dollars, up to an annual limit, can be contributed by an individual to his or her account, which account is invested, and the balance of the account will rise and fall with the market depending on the investments the account holder elects. Generally (as with 401(k) plans), the participant will simply hire a third-party firm to do the actual investing. IRAs are also qualified vehicles into which other qualified retirement assets can be “rolled over,” tax-free, as discussed more below.

Given the diversification of the financial industry in recent years, which continues today almost in exponential fashion, it is impossible to list every type of retirement plan or asset that is presently available. Beyond basic defined contribution/defined benefit plans, our firm sees a lot of public plans and IRAs, as well as some of the following: (1) 403(b) plans — public schools and nonprofits; (2) “nonqualified” plans — generally for highest earners who want to exceed the annual contribution limits; (3) SIMPLE IRAs — meld of 401(k) and IRAs, where employer agrees to match employee’s contributions into an IRA; and (4) employee stock ownership plans (“ESOPs”) — like a 401(k), except instead of cash, the employee gets company stock or stock options. Competent attorneys should have ample experience with the most common types of retirement assets, but where the retirement asset is unique or unusual, even competent attorneys will seek input from financial advisers, accountants, and other experts in the field, prior to negotiating and finalizing terms of a divorce settlement.

Process Used for Division and Distribution

The first step in dividing and distributing retirement assets in a Minnesota divorce is determining which retirement assets are subject to division and distribution in the first place. This is a question of marital versus nonmarital property (some states call this “community versus separate property”). Generally speaking, only the marital interest of retirement assets is subject to division and distribution in divorce. In Minnesota, for instance, contributions made by the employee/employer prior to the date of marriage are nonmarital property, and therefore not subject to division and distribution in a divorce. “Tracing” is also an important concept; whereas nonmarital cash (such as an inheritance) that is contributed to a retirement account will generally not be divisible in a divorce, the appreciation in value of that account will generally be treated as marital in nature. The worst outcome here would be failing to make nonmarital claims, and failing to object to the other party’s bogus nonmarital claims. To prevent such mistakes, competent legal counsel should be obtained early on in the divorce proceeding.


Accurately valuing retirement assets is commonly overlooked by spouses as well as attorneys with little familiarity in this subject matter. Our office makes it a practice to accurately value both parties’ retirement assets. First, the valuation date of marital property is usually tied to the court’s scheduling order, though some states fix different standards, and in all states, the parties can mutually agree to use a valuation date of their choosing, which is commonly done. Second, for defined benefit plans, an actuary is usually required to accurately provide a value as of the valuation date. Otherwise, a spouse could try to argue that, because he or she is not actually receiving cash payments yet, his or her pension does not need to be counted in the marital estate, which is not accurate at all. As discussed below, survivors’ and other benefits are also valuable and should be valued along with the participant’s basic pension benefits. Third, for defined contribution plans, valuation generally consists of obtaining an account or balance statement for the particular valuation date. Lastly, as discussed below, where tax consequences need to be factored into the valuations of retirement assets, accountants should be hired to perform those analyses. At the end of the day, the goal is to arrive at an accurate assessment of what each spouse contributes in terms of value to the marital estate. All retirement assets must be included in that assessment. Then the work of negotiating out a fair divorce settlement, or seeking relief in the courts if necessary, can begin.

QDROs: When Are They Needed?

Almost every article about retirement assets in divorce sufficiently covers qualified domestic relations orders (“QDROs”), so we will not spend a lot of time on it here. It suffices to say that ERISA-governed plans require a QDRO (basically a second court order) to divide and distribute benefits, and will not make any changes without a QDRO. In QDROs, divisions, and distributions of retirement assets are described as “assignments” and other terms and conditions of the assignment are provided in QDROs as well. Note that, while public plans are not governed by ERISA, many have similar QDRO-like requirements that must be satisfied. An attorney familiar with drafting QDROs and the various procedures for submitting QDROs to the courts and plans for preapproval/approval should be consulted when the terms of the entire divorce have been agreed upon. Usually, plans have sample QDRO language that they will preapprove, and it is advisable to contact the respective plans ahead of time and obtain such sample QDRO materials.

In defined benefit/pension plans, generally, division and distribution occur either (1) as a percentage share of the “marital interest,” or a percentage share or flat amount of each monthly payment (“shared interest” approach); or (2) as a newly created, separately defined benefit for the former spouse (“separate interest” approach). Shared interest approaches are much more common than separate interest approaches, and in shared interest approaches, the alternate payee begins receiving his or her award when the participant begins receiving his or her benefits. On the other hand, defined contribution plans are generally divided and distributed as a percentage of the account balance as of the valuation date, with all subsequent market increases and decreases allocated to that particular spouse’s share. Lastly, each spouse usually agrees to be equally responsible for any administrative costs that the plan imposes for implementing the division and distribution of the retirement assets. For non-ERISA and nonpublic plans such as IRAs, no QDRO is required to implement the division and distribution of those retirement assets. Rather, the firm with which the retirement assets are maintained will simply implement the terms of the divorce judgment and decree, usually upon (1) receipt of a certified copy of the same, and (2) a letter of instruction with a signature guarantee. Usually, the recipient spouse is also required to fill out all necessary administrative forms to open a new account to receive the transfer. Each non-ERISA plan, we have found, has its own particular procedures and requirements, and so it is advisable to confer with these plans’ representatives prior to finalizing the terms and conditions of the divorce judgment and decree.

Tax Consequences

Immediate and adverse tax consequences should be a concern for defined contribution tax-deferred plans, like 401(k) plans and IRAs. As discussed above, these types of IRC-governed plans are subject to (1) penalties for early withdrawals, and (2) immediate taxability as income. Fortunately, if done right, both taxes can be avoided. If a QDRO is used in conjunction with a qualified “rollover” — meaning that the divided and distributed funds are transferred into another IRC-qualified vehicle — then both taxes are avoided. If no qualified rollover is elected, meaning that the recipient spouse simply receives a lump-sum cash payment, then there is no penalty per the QDRO, but the payment is immediately taxable as income. If a QDRO is not required to be used, then the divorce judgment and decree will suffice as long as a qualified rollover is accomplished; if no qualified rollover is implemented, then the distributed funds will both be penalized and immediately taxable as income. Some spouses accept as a part of the divorce settlement these tax consequences, and in turn, demand that these tax obligations reduce the overall value of the award they are getting; in such instances, consultation and analyses by an accountant will be necessary.

There are also IRS forms that will need to be completed and filed along with the tax returns of the parties, depending on the tax goals of the parties. Again, consultation with an accountant will be necessary to ensure compliance with the IRC and any applicable regulations.

Survivors’ Benefits

Lastly, something many spouses and attorneys overlook is survivors’ and other benefits. These issues generally only arise in defined benefit and public plans. Survivors’ benefits provide that, if the participant predeceases the former spouse, the plan will continue to pay some or all of those benefits to the surviving former spouse. ERISA requires its covered plans to provide this surviving spouse protection, both before and after retirement. From the former spouse’s perspective, these rights should be stated and preserved in a QDRO; from the participant’s perspective, because these ERISA-required protections reduce the overall benefit for the participant and any future spouses/beneficiaries, waivers in writing are often sought from the former spouse, in exchange for some other assets within the marital estate. Private negotiation generally resolves most survivors’ benefits issues. Because public plans do not provide former spouses with ERISA-like protections, it is especially important for former spouses of public employees to contact an attorney to ensure he or she is not waiving or forfeiting any valuable survivors’ rights that may nonetheless be available in the plan documents or applicable laws.

Early Retirement Benefits

Other benefits that should be addressed include early retirement benefits (when the employee retires prior to “normal retirement age,” or in most plans age 65); other types of “death benefits” (usually in the form of lump-sum reimbursements of unused employee contributions); and naming beneficiaries for a newly assigned share (such as, in a defined benefit plan, a subsequent spouse, or in a defined contribution plan, “beneficiaries” such as children). These various benefits and rights all have value and should be included in the marital estate and subject to valuation, division, and distribution as well.

Identifying the Issues

It is crucial to know both (1) what types of retirement assets are part of the marital estate, and (2) how to go about valuing, dividing, and distributing them, ensuring that all areas of concern like tax consequences and survivors’ and other benefits are appropriately addressed. This article provides a starting point for both of these subject matters, hopefully answering some basic questions about the division and distribution of retirement assets in divorce.

Real Estate Division & Transfer

Real estate and land need to be given special attention in a divorce, both to ensure that the proper valuation is put on the land and also to make certain the land is effectively transferred to the receiving party after the marriage is dissolved. Our family law attorneys are experienced in addressing real estate division and transfer issues, including uncommon and complex transfer problems as well as uniform appraisal standards and valuation issues. We regularly argue about the marital and nonmarital components of real estate and work to make sure our clients’ interests are adequately protected. We also deal with marital liens, mortgages, and security issues to help our clients, who are being paid money by their ex-spouses over time, to have the right and legal ability to obtain and liquidate assets awarded to their ex-spouse if payments are not timely made.

Division of Marital Assets

Property owned by married parties falls into the category of “marital” or “nonmarital property” and is subject to division as part of a marital dissolution or legal separation action.

“Marital property” is property obtained by the parties at any time during the marriage.

“Nonmarital property” includes any property acquired by either spouse before, during, or after the existence of their marriage that is:

  • Acquired as a gift or inheritance made by a third party to one but not the other spouse
  • Acquired before the marriage
  • Acquired by a spouse after the valuation date
  • Excluded by a valid antenuptial contract (also known as a prenuptial agreement)
  • Acquired in exchange for, or the increase in value of, property that is described as in any of the above

Even if property is deemed to be nonmarital, the court may still grant a portion of that nonmarital property to the other spouse if the award of marital property is so inadequate as to work an unfair hardship, considering all relevant circumstances.

How does the court divide property?

In a divorce, the court makes a “just and equitable” division of the marital property of the parties without regard to marital misconduct.

Equitable does NOT mean equal.

A just and equitable disposition of the marital property does not necessarily mean that the property must be divided equally. The court has significant discretion in determining what is just and equitable in the circumstances.

The courts must make specific findings regarding division of property, and the court bases its findings on many relevant factors, including the following:

  • Length of marriage
  • Any prior marriage of a party
  • Age of each party
  • The health of each party
  • The stations of each party
  • The occupation of each party
  • The amount and sources of income of each party
  • Vocational skills of each party
  • Employability of each party
  • Estate of each party
  • Liabilities of each party
  • Needs of each party
  • Opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets and income of each party

How is the property value determined?

The valuation of property is a very difficult issue in divorces, and it is important to consider the use of experts in valuing property with substantial value. The value of property is a question of fact and, therefore, no two people may necessarily agree, unless the property is easily valued on an open market like, for example, a publicly traded stock. On the other hand, a piece of real property may be valued differently by two real estate appraisers.

Some property is difficult to value, such as closely held corporations or other business entities. In these situations, your attorney will typically engage a valuation expert to assist in arriving at a value of the business entity.

What if I don’t like what the judge did?

Once the court has made an award of property, it is deemed to be final. The award is not subject to modification unless overturned on an appeal, or unless one party committed a fraud in disclosing the nature and extent of his or her property.

Debt Division

What happens to our debts?

Just as the court is required to fairly divide property, it must also fairly divide the couple’s debts. Sometimes, debts can be substantial. Some considerations in dividing debts are whether the debt was incurred for the benefit of both parties and whether one party has the better ability to satisfy the debt. Also, important considerations include who the debt is owed to and whether the claim is that the debt is to a family member (or should it be categorized as a gift). Documentation and other evidence are vitally important to be able to prove that your proposed division of debt is one the court should adopt. Trial judges have a lot of discretion in dividing debts. Sometimes, instead of dividing an asset or debt, a court will award the asset to one party, subject to a lien, mortgage, or other security interest in the other property. This is frequently done regarding homestead property.

Associated Attorneys


  • December 5, 2023Family LawDivorce

    Dealing with Divorce and Taxes

    Divorce and taxes—two topics most people don’t wish to think about. However, tax issues have a substantial impact on divorce and the lives of those involved. Here are a few key divorce tax takeaways that are sometimes forgotten: Update Your Withholdings. People typically file a new form W-4 with an employer to change withholdings after...

  • June 26, 2023Family LawTrusts & Estates+2

    Divorce and Your Estate Plan

    The last thing a person wants to do after getting divorced is spend more time with a lawyer. But updating an estate plan after divorce is crucial. In Minnesota, when a dissolution is granted a former spouse’s interest in the ex-spouse’s will is terminated as if the ex-spouse had died one day prior to the...

  • August 1, 2022Family LawDivorce

    The Great Wealth Transfer Is Here. Have You Divorce-Proofed Your Children’s Inheritance?

    It is estimated that in the United States over the next 20 years more than $50 trillion in wealth will transfer from the Baby Boomers to Generation X and the Millennials. That is a lot of money. This Great Wealth Transfer is not going to occur just through inheritances when Baby Boomers die. Baby Boomer...

  • February 7, 2022Agriculture Law & AgribusinessFamily Law+2

    Farm Divorce: The Complex and Confounding Concept of the “Double Dip”

    One of the most challenging concepts for many family law attorneys (and even some business valuation experts) is the “double dip.” The double dip issue arises in many divorces involving farms or small businesses and can have a substantial impact on the bottom line if not correctly accounted for and addressed. Double dipping in the...

  • June 2, 2021Family LawDivorce

    Minnesota Supreme Court Weighs in on Spousal Maintenance Modifications

    On May 26, 2021, the Minnesota Supreme Court filed its decision in Honke v. Honke. In that case, ex-wife received post-divorce cash gifts from her parents of $500,000.00 during the time she was also receiving spousal maintenance from her ex-husband. Ex-husband asked the trial court to reduce or terminate his spousal maintenance based on the...